swatski
Jetboaters Fleet Admiral 1*
- Messages
- 12,806
- Reaction score
- 18,573
- Points
- 822
- Location
- North Caldwell, NJ
- Boat Make
- Yamaha
- Year
- 2016
- Boat Model
- AR
- Boat Length
- 24
I never understood why is the low-RPM throttle response so lousy in these boats?
Here is mine, not the best clip but gets the point across: Why is there so much dead range in the low end?
There is the "no wake" zone/range - up to the first "indent" - but past that is still dead zone for at least half of the usable range... Why?
Are E-Series boats with real fly-by-wire throttles better at this? Maybe someone can chime in and show the low end response of an E-Series boat?
In my boat, when the throttle levers are pushed ahead the response is initially poor (none) until the engines pick up, and then lurche forward with little finesse. This is annoying and leads to clumsy handling especially when pulling for water sports: ramping up to speed is not as easy as it should be. Once the RideSteady (or PerfectPass) take over, it is no problem in that instance (with the RideSteady - knob control is super fine). But getting there, through that first half of the range that's all play/dead, that's the issue.
(Both engines start well and idle reasonably smoothly and my throttle cables are adjusted about as good as they can be, no issues there - there is no slack in cables and I get the full range rotating the APS, up to the stop at WOT. )
I understand that cable throttles have a nonlinear progressive throttle action which opens the throttle slowly at low-end and faster at high-end, but this here is just excessive, IMO. Especially in all the newer boats with APSs (accelerator position sensor) - there is no reason for that.
Is an ECU reflash the only solution? I know it can work, from my previous experience.
--
Here is mine, not the best clip but gets the point across: Why is there so much dead range in the low end?
There is the "no wake" zone/range - up to the first "indent" - but past that is still dead zone for at least half of the usable range... Why?
Are E-Series boats with real fly-by-wire throttles better at this? Maybe someone can chime in and show the low end response of an E-Series boat?
In my boat, when the throttle levers are pushed ahead the response is initially poor (none) until the engines pick up, and then lurche forward with little finesse. This is annoying and leads to clumsy handling especially when pulling for water sports: ramping up to speed is not as easy as it should be. Once the RideSteady (or PerfectPass) take over, it is no problem in that instance (with the RideSteady - knob control is super fine). But getting there, through that first half of the range that's all play/dead, that's the issue.
(Both engines start well and idle reasonably smoothly and my throttle cables are adjusted about as good as they can be, no issues there - there is no slack in cables and I get the full range rotating the APS, up to the stop at WOT. )
I understand that cable throttles have a nonlinear progressive throttle action which opens the throttle slowly at low-end and faster at high-end, but this here is just excessive, IMO. Especially in all the newer boats with APSs (accelerator position sensor) - there is no reason for that.
Is an ECU reflash the only solution? I know it can work, from my previous experience.
--
Last edited: