We are delighted you have found your way to the best Jet Boaters Forum on the internet! Please consider Signing Up so that you can enjoy all the features and offers on the forum. We have members with boats from all the major manufacturers including Yamaha, Seadoo, Scarab and Chaparral. We don't email you SPAM, and the site is totally non-commercial. So what's to lose? IT IS FREE!
Membership allows you to ask questions (no matter how mundane), meet up with other jet boaters, see full images (not just thumbnails), browse the member map and qualifies you for members only discounts offered by vendors who run specials for our members only! (It also gets rid of this banner!)
Click Here for more information>Ride Steady group buy for JetBoaters.net members only
You can dismiss this Notice by clicking the "X" in the upper right>>>>>
Thought electric was the way???Go big or go home...drop a couple of V6's and new pumps into the bigger models. Plenty of room.
Thought electric was the way???
Yamaha helped develop an amazing V6 back in the '90's. Ended up under the hood of a Ford Taurus of all things.Go big or go home...drop a couple of V6's and new pumps into the bigger models. Plenty of room.
Bigger may add more power but it also adds more weight and decreased fuel efficiency most of the time.
I had a 455 Oldsmobile Berkley Jet about 30 years ago in a Browning tri-hull. It had a 10:1 Compression Ration and required high octane fuel for the RPM's it was turning.
A friend of mine built a 426 Hemi with a blower for his speed boat. He had to mix his own fuel.
They were fast and fun but heavy in the stern and they drank gas like water.
Engines today are much lighter and more efficient but if you start looking at two V6's you're probably going to need a minimum of a 9 to 9 1/2' beam to deal with the extra width and weight.... unless Yamaha starts producing a 30 footer.
A little more bore and / or stroke to push the 1.8L over 2L wouldn't require much, if any, of a hull change.
Things have changed...The MR-1 HO's in the 230 series boats ran nearly a 12:1 CR and 10,200 rpm's at WOT and ran 87 octane, though I ran ethynol free 89. With all the different size OB motors Yamaha puts out, it should be easy.
whats to edge me to ever want to upgrade when my 9 yr old boat has the SAME motors !!!
You started this same discussion exactly 11 months ago, with almost the same exact title. I think the reasons and discussion are exactly the same. And most of us are more than happy with our performance.1.8s are great .. but old now .... boats are getting heavier each year with all added features ect ... we need 2.2 liter motors with larger pumps ...
I would have to agree, that the motors are the last thing folks notice (on these boats) if I were upgrading, as having reliable, efficient power is all most ask for. Give me farkles, lots of cool electronics and creature comforts.Have you been in a 252? It is lightyears ahead of 2013 240.
That is it there. (Caution, “internet statistics” ahead.) Of Yamaha engines, 80% go in motorcycles, 19% go in waverunners, and 1% go into boats. Unless that changes, there is never going to be a boat specific engine.…@yam240sx Does have a point. We've so far just been adapting Jet Ski tech to larger boats. …
That is it there. (Caution, “internet statistics” ahead.) Of Yamaha engines, 80% go in motorcycles, 19% go in waverunners, and 1% go into boats. Unless that changes, there is never going to be a boat specific engine.
2010 calling here. What is the boat tech like in future? I imagine they come with really good, flexible audio systems and no one upgrades them anymore. Probably got Navionics built in and you can just update your maps with the click of a button. Are the engines finally quiet?Have you been in a 252? It is lightyears ahead of 2013 240.
Go big or go home...drop a couple of V6's and new pumps into the bigger models. Plenty of room.
That is a big miss on my part. I really don’t know what goes in the outboards. I assume no 4bangers.They sell a lot of outboards too. Boat specific.