CA magazine ban ruled unconstitutional

[3 green tornados]

A three panel judge from the 9th circuit court has ruled that CA ban of magazines holding more than 10 rounds is unconstitutional.

 

[JWExperience]

Good, it’s about time something was done about that. I’m hoping it works it’s way East now. King Cuomo thinks you don’t need more than ten rounds to kill a deer and fails to understand the basis of that amendment.

 

[Gunner]

I think NJ is worse with its asinine hollow point ban.

 

[JWExperience]

I think NJ is worse with its asinine hollow point ban.

Maybe but in NY they rushed the SAFE act through so quickly that they forgot a law enforcement exemption for mag capacity so cops were breaking the law initially since pistol mag capacity here is seven or less. Measuring contest for dumbest lawmakers...

 

[Gunner]

Politicians never fail to show how stupid they can be.

 

[Rjfb]

Please lose the politics, it’s supposed to be about jetboats

 

[3 green tornados]

Not stating this to be argumentative or to be disrespectful, but that is why I posted this in the General Off Topic. Figured if it suited someone to read it and state their feelings it would not take away from the boat talk. My life isn’t 100% about boats and this part of the forum allows for non-boat related talk. Feel free to not participate in this conversation and allow those of us that do want to discuss it, the ability to do so in an area that was designated for it.

The CA handgun roster has a bill That is in the state senate committee right now that would require CA to remove three guns for each gun added. Hopefully those inCA that support gun rights don’t have to waste our money fighting another unconstitutional measure.
New York and New Jersey are a couple of the worst offenders right up there with CA.

 

[JWExperience]

I consider this a conversation about freedom and think that is getting confused with politics. I don’t think it’s political to talk about the constitution and case law.

 

[Gunner]

Troll Alert

 

[F.M.]

 

[Julian]

This topic is borderline on our rules about no controversial topics. @Bruce and I discussed it and we are keeping an eye on the tone of replies. If it starts getting personal with name calling etc. we will be forced to close the thread to replies. We will also give warnings to anyone who crosses the line into personal attacks.

 

[Dixie Highway]

Personally I'm glad to see judges upholding the Bill of Rights. Regardless of politics, if someone ruled a certain statement to be allowed under the First Amendment I don't think it's too controversial. I'm just glad to hear we still get to exercise those rights.