- Messages
- 6,590
- Reaction score
- 3,279
- Points
- 422
- Location
- Lake Ray Roberts, Texas
- Boat Make
- Boatless
- Year
- NA
- Boat Model
- Other
- Boat Length
- NA
@Helipilot11 , I agree, any tool is only appropriate if used correctly. Plenty of guys resist using the HUD when they first check out on the 737. It is unfamiliar to them and gives clutter as you describe when not used correctly. I myself am a HUD cripple. It gives so much good info, that flying without it is just a WAG comparatively speaking. It is designed to give early warning tail strike info as well as prevent heads down periods when flying a CAT III ILS to minimums. That is done with 600 feet horizontal visibility and no ceiling requirement at 145kts +/- in a -800. So not using the HUD for take offs and landings is not an option, but it is pretty easy to look past in our work.The HUD you guys are using is very similar to what we attach to our goggles when flying at night. I can see how it is very useful for commerical pilots but I know a lot of Blackhawk pilots don't like it. We are able to dim it down to be invisible since we are "required" to wear it. Flying a helicopter it seems as if obstacles come out of no where especially in Afghanistan. Some pilots focus so much on the display and fail scan which can become very dangerous quickly. Like mentioned above about having these tools are awesome but the operator must know when to use them/manage them.